Qualify … Disqualify

Qualify … Disqualify


Qualify … Disqualify

Posted: 15 Jun 2011 03:59 AM PDT

There isnt much nowadays to write about anything in Batu. The most recent being the social visit of the Deputy Prime Minister to Batu 2 weeks ago and while it was herald as the first visit by a heavy weight from the Federal Government for the year 2011, the crowd was by most standard mediocre and the reception luke warm after the VVIP left the stage. And for that, nobody knew how much was used to feed the people (for breakfast) who turned up that morning, but I was told it was in the 30s – 50s of thousand ringgit.

Is it worth the tax payers money to do this kind of publicity when so much of KL city folk woes are still not being addressed. And eventhough the Federal Territory Minister made sure that development in KL kept up its pace with the rest of the other states in Malaysia, (he must at least be given the credit for doing more than any other FT Minister had in the past), but more needs to be done to take back the lost territory of KL from the grasp of the Pakatan reps.

Yesterday, there was a move by a young-at-heart MP by the name of Bung Mokhtar who tried to move a motion in the Parliament to remove and/or disqualify my nemesis (in Batu) from his position as an MP. This was as a result of Tian Chua (whom allegedly) bit a police constable way back in 2007 during a protest staged outside of Parliament.

I think gone are the days that we should use this kind of lowly tactic to oust anybody from their position as MPs or as "People's Representatives". If we really do it, it would be the biggest mistake that the BN in KL will have made in the face of an impending General Election. The" rules of the game" and the "ethics of politics" has always been to face your opponent squarely and win the battle fair and square. No amount of dirty-tactics will win the people's heart in the long run if we resort to filthy tactics.

But on the other hand, if we must disqualify anybody, we must do it to those candidates whom have:

1) Redicule ladies and woman folks that they are the more inferior species by citing uncalled for remarks about them leaking once a month (do you remember which MP who did that?)

2) Benefitted billions from contracts that are still the subject matter of an Anti-Corruption case now on-going, (the Chinese call it Pok Kai Future Zeneration)

3) Used his position in Government to influence the sale and purchase of properties for personal use,

4) Used their position in Local Council to "pull wool over the eyes" of civil servants as to the approval of land matters for their own benefit,

5) Refuse to take responsibility for sexual misconduct while an elected representative.

The above list may not be exhaustive but you get my point!

I think voters themselves are now awakened by the fact that we cannot be hoodwinked by politicians who think we are dumb-dumbs. We may have limited information as to the whole process as to how the Government is running the country, but in due time and in due course, whatever anybody does and how they do it, cannot be hide from the eyes of the masses.


MToday vs MChronicle

MToday vs MChronicle


MToday vs MChronicle

Posted: 29 Dec 2010 06:16 PM PST

To be honest, I have not read Malaysia Today for a very very long, long, long time. Because initially I thought RPK was an agent of PKR. Then I found out how wrong I was.

In the last few months or so, I noticed that RPK seems to have turned his attention away momentarily from disclosing the wrongdoings of BN and went on a hunt for the wrong-doings of Pakatan Rakyat.

Then a deluge of exchanges between a "YL Choong" guy and Wong Choon Mei of Malaysia Chronicle started us on the radar screen to find out what was happening in digital newsportal.

I find it interesting to observe and read that when RPK was on the shooting spree of BN, all the digital newsportal went on a march together with MToday to do maximum coverage and damage to BN.

But when RPK focuses on the short-comings of Pakatan Rakyat, all the goonies in PR fired back at RPK. This I believe, is the blindness that a lot of us politicians suffer when our identity or core values surrounding a political ideology is challenged.

They cant seem to detach themselves from their own shadows and step back (for a while) to ascertain if what is said about their Party or Struggle is at fault.

Another thing I didnt know until recently was that somehow or somewhat that our Batu MP Tian Chua is associated with MChronicle. And this is not my assertion but the findings of RPK. Therefore I have no great urge to deny what RPK says so.

If that is the case, could MChronicle have been used all these while to discredit the workings of the PM and also BN so that a long term goal can be achieved for PR? Putrajaya??

Another thing I did observe is that, no matter what you say or dont like about RPK, there is no shortage of readers out there who is dead-loyal to what RPK have to say about the future of politics in Malaysia.

I think if you think deep and hard enough, you may be able to come to a conclusion that what RPK is really doing is for the good of the country. And that is, to expose the amount of abuse, corruption etc that have been present in the system for too long and to get the country back on track.

And that includes firing the mis-deeds of both BN and PR if they exist.

If that is the ultimate goal and I believe now, after reading MToday for the last 3 years, we should applaud the efforts of RPK and urge him to continue doing so no matter which side of the political divide all of us belong to.

Because in the end, we must always remember, it is not the politicians that are the masters of this country, it is the voters, the citizens that are the determinants …

Today may be the 2nd last day for 2010, but I can smell a lot more is going to happen politically for the country in the days ahead … so lets keep tap … esp what RPK has to say … coz I am!


My Youth Chief Speech at PNDC 2010

My Youth Chief Speech at PNDC 2010


My Youth Chief Speech at PNDC 2010

Posted: 05 Dec 2010 05:34 PM PST

The Main points of my Youth Chief Speech at the Gerakan PNDC 2010 (4th December 2010)

 

1) Tahun ini merupakan kali pertama dimana Persidangan Perwakilan Pemuda & Wanita diadakan berasing daripada Badan Induk. Ini adalah atas sebab-sebab yg tidak boleh dielakkan. Oleh kerana tarikh asal NDC yg dirancang pd 6 Nov terjatuh pada satu hari selepas Deepavali, kedua2 Jawatankuasa Pemuda & Wanita telah mengambil keputusan untuk menunda Persidangan Perwakilan ini ke satu tarikh yang sesuai untuk semua wakil2 kami yang beragama Hindu.

 Jika ada kesulitan atas sebab logistik, saya bagi pihak Jawatankuasa Pemuda meminta maaf terutamanya kepada Perwakilan dari Sabah kerana mereka terpaksa menukar rancangan perjalanan mereka yang asal. Semua ini boleh menunjukan bahawa kita mengambil berat atas semangat Satu Hati dalam Parti.

2) Pada tahun lepas 2009, dalam Ucapan Ketua Pemuda, saya telah mengambil tidak kurang daripada 40 minit dalam ucapan tersebut untuk menyentuh atas pelbagai topik semasa. Dan pada mulanya, saya pun merancang untuk membuat demikian untuk tahun 2010, iaitu menulis Ucapan saya mengikut reaksi topik2 semasa yang telah berlaku pada setahun ini.

Tetapi semua ini berubah selepas Tanggal 24 Bulan 11. Dengan ketinggalan seorang pengasas parti kami, mendiang Dr LimCE telah meninggalkan kesan yang begitu mendalam bukan sahaja bagi saya malah semua pihak dari atasan ke bawah parti kami. Dan jasa beliau tidak boleh dilupakan sebegitu sahaja, kami khasnya di sayap Pemuda mesti senantiasa mengingati pengajaran yang beliau telah bagikan kepada kami.

3) Maka, dengan idea tersebut, pada tahun ini, dalam ucapan Ketua Pemuda, saya akan membuat satu perubahan secara 180 darjah. Iaitu, jika dulu saya mementingkan isu2 semasa, pada tahun ini, saya akan menyentuh pada keseluruhan atas ideology perjuangan mendiang Dr LimCE.

4) A 180 degrees change will necessitate that we focus inward (rather than outward) – to Rethink and Re-Energise the ideals that the late founder has fought so hard for us.

I believe Dr LimCE's struggles can be categorised under 2 broad thrust – the first being, a political party must understand deeply what the rakyat wants. And secondly, to work with the Government to achieve those hopes and wants for the rakyat.

At this juncture, you may realise that I have changed the language of my delivery. This is not to downgrade the usage of our National Language in our NDC, as I have advocated last year that all delegates are encouraged to use Bahasa Malaysia in all their debates and speeches. But the intention is to retain the spirit of Dr LimCE's ideas especially those found in books that have written about him; that I prefer to deliver the rest of my speech in English. To take time to translate these important messages from English to Malay will only delay the urgency of it reaching the delegates soonest possible.

 

THE 1ST THRUST OF PGRM'S STRUGGLE

"A political party must understand deeply what the rakyat wants."

1) Suqiu 1999, Hindraf 2007

  • We cannot just brush things aside

2) Malays voting for the PAST (spelt P.A.S.T.) – this is because UMNO have since the days of Merdeka been fighting for their rights.

Indians voting for the PRESENT – most of them are worried about bread & butter issues.

Chinese voting for the FUTURE – they are worried about the well being of their children and grandchildren.

The question is, are these 3 groups of people going to increasingly vote for the Past, the Present or the Future as the country move forward? 

3) What do the Chinese want?

What do the Indians want?

Why not ask, what do Malaysians want?

(i) Honest Govt accountable to the people. No more Govt before the People. It should be the People before the Govt.

(ii) A Govt free of corruption & conflict of interest.

(iii) A clear seperation of Parliament, Executive & Judiciary with a system of checks & balances.

(iv) Institutions of Govt, Police, MACC, Election Comm, Civil Service to act independently & professionally.

(v) A society where workers can live in dignity, earning wages that can support their families.

(vi) Fair education and health services.

(vii) Independent & free media.

(viii) Basic rights to be protected. The freedom to associate. The freedom to speak up.

(ix) Equality of race. Fairness in religious treatment.

(x) Environment to be protected.

4) Another contentious issue. The NEP & NEM

  • 3 years ago, Lim Teck Ghee on 30% bumi equity participation. Got fired left, right, centre. Some say 17%, others say 45%
  • Because there was never a tracking system for the administration to ascertain when each milestone was reached.
  • Because targets were never publicly made known & advertised (ie no public watch)
  • Swayed too far away from the main aim of equal distribution and eradication of poverty but spend too much time & attention on achieving minor targets, eg 30% quota.
  • To plug the leakages of dwindling bumi participation in PLCs, I propose the setting up of a Bumi Equity Unit Trust (similar to all the Amanah Saham schemes) to absorb exiting bumi investors so that bumi equity participation in PLCs will never be reduced. All IPOs approved by the SC already have a 30% bumi equity requirement, so how did it dropped to 17%. Leakages occur because unscrupulous bumi investors misuse the privileges to make a quick profit.
  • We cannot stop people from making a profit, but when they do decide to take profit, they must also help the Govt to keep the bumi participation capped at 30%. So that when you have made your money, other deserving bumi investors can also buy those shares from the Bumi Equity Unit Trust and made their profits. This is call, "one stone kill two bird". Bumi investors can make money & the Govt can ensure that bumi participation is always at 30% or more!

 

  • Another way to equalised the disparity between the rich and the poor, in as far as buying property is concerned, those who can afford to buy a property above RM500k should not be given any discounts. And what they have paid should go towards helping to subsidise bumis who cannot afford to even buy a low cost house.
  • Car import AP holders, only a handful. APs should be liberalised and be given to other deserving genuine bumi businesses/entrepreneurs. To the extent of sharing their privileges by subsidizing other bumis who cannot afford to buy cheap transport vehicles.

 

THE 2ND THRUST OF PGRM'S STRUGGLE

 "To work with the Government to achieve those hopes and wants for the rakyat."

1) The PM did on the day of the funeral of Dr LimCE wrote in the visitors book that DrLimCE was instrumental together with his late father Tun Razak in the formation of BN. Gerakan therefore in no small way, plays an important role in seeing the perpetuation and continuation of BN for the years to come.

2) Why did LCE decided to joint forces with the Govt when he could have been the State Govt on their own? Because if he worked alone, he could only have gone so far. Combine resources.

3) We always pride ourselves that we are the conscience of BN. We speak up not because we just want to make noise, but because we care about the future of BN.

4) It is no more intentional than coincidental that the BN Convention falls on the same weekend as our Youth & Wanita NDC. This shows and also signal to us that we need to focus on the original mission of BN.

We have seen the likes of Transformation Programmes – GTP, ETP. We must also have a BNTP (Barisan Nasional Transformation Programme), if we are to steer the country forward.

5) In 1974 when BN was formed, it was herald as a force to be reckon with and it got the mandate from the rakyat because the policies were fair and just. 

  • The Dacing symbol of BN – Fair & Just.
  • How many years have we been using it without given much attention and have almost to the point of forgetting its significance envisaged by our forefathers.
  • The Dacing also applies to the coalition of BN.
  • The BN formula is not a "1+12" formula but a 13 Party Formula. That means we are here to share the powers & responsibilities together.

 

  • Umno took Timbalan, S/U, Bendahari, Ketua Penerangan, etc.
  • The 1st BN Sec Gen in 1974 was Michael Chen.

6) Return to the 1974 BN Formula – One Party One Vote.

7) Another important issue with the rakyat – is BN (the coalition as a whole) the Govt or are individual parties the Govt? If BN as a coalition is the Govt, then BN as a whole should set policies! – Education/Places of worship

THE JOINT COOPERATION OF PEMUDA & BELIAWANIS

  • Promoting & providing equal opportunity to the young men & women members of the party.
  • Providing choice to them to be active in the roles that they choose


Does It Filter Through?

Does It Filter Through?


Does It Filter Through?

Posted: 21 Oct 2010 08:40 PM PDT

This week sees the meeting of all UMNO delegates from around the country, culminating in the 61st General Assembly of the United Malays National Organisation (UMNO).

I'm glad that the PM has the courage to boldly state and reiterate again the important positions of all the races and their contribution towards nation-building and that ALL must be acknowledged for their hard work.

He also had the foresight to remind us again that the way forward is to work together as One Malaysians and not as 'individualistic groupings of races'.

Kudos also goes to Sharizat and Khairy (in their speech) for their far sightedness in preparing the ground for their delegates to see the importance of working as One and not as diverse groups.

They were all saying the right things to pull UMNO forward. And they were all saying it at this most opportune time. Other issues that got to be mentioned were the social contract and the economic pie. And we were (as non-malays) given the confidence that our positions (just like the malays) were enshrined in the constitution.

Problem is … … who doesn't know this? It was all there since 1957. Nothing much of the Federal Constitution has changed except for a short period where our beloved Dr M (fourth PM) did boldly changed some of the articles (wordings) to curb the powers of the judiciary, otherwise its been edged in stone ever since.

So why is there the need to reiterate the position of the malays and the non-malays now?

I truely, sincerely and whole-heartedly believe that PM is serious in wanting to change the social landscape of the country. By means of economic architecture and social engineering. And from the close-door dialogues we had with the PM plus the opportunities I had to talk to his close-aides, I get the strong impression that he meant business.

To make the argument stronger, through our private meeting with Khairy (BN Youth Chair), we also get the same impression and feedback.

My worry is that, it all sounds well on the platform, but does all this nicely worded regurgitations and impromptu speeches filter through in the end of the day?

The first resistance that I hear is already visible in the "inner struggle" (body-language) amongst the delegates. In the DPM's speech to the Wanita, Pemuda & Puteri on Tuesday (19 Oct 2010) he inserted at least half a dozen times mentioned the word 'inclusive' in his wonderfully prepared speech. Inclusive in the sense that we must include all races in the development of the nation.

But somewhere in the middle of his speech, he touched on the need for them (I dont know if it means him or he wanted to include the party) to embrace those NGOs that also fight for the rights of the malay-people. The first thing that came to my mind was an organisation called Perkasa. Eventhough he did not specifically named Perkasa as such, the surrounding circumstances and timing of his mention can and only point to 'that' organisation.

Couple with the fact that, I still dont see any changes of how UMNO Bahagian chiefs behave and treat the common people (let alone their own members in the bahagian). The air of arrogance is evermore present and doesnt seem to diminish with the PM's call for unity and coorperation.

What I'm saying here stems from my own experience with dealing with the UMNO deadwood in my area. And I have not received any divergence of opinions from my own state liasion colleagues as far as Wilayah is concerned.

So if I, from among the middle to top levels of leadership in BN have that kind of feeling, what will the common rakyat feel if they continue to read this kind of rhetorics in the newspapers but see no changes in the behaviours and attitudes of leaders below the MT (majlis tertinggi) of UMNO. Is this a bankable perception that we can rely on?

There's is no trickle down of effect …


On The Technology Front

On The Technology Front


On The Technology Front

Posted: 21 Sep 2010 05:03 AM PDT

(Steve Jobs at the launching of the iPad)

by Alvin Yeo

On the technology front, it is always easy to know what is hot and what is not. You have to look rather carefully at the responses of both the consumers and also the product's advertising campaign.

But what I am going to write about is not a product review per say but the future of where this may lead to. We cannot deny the fact that such techno- gizmos will eventually shape and dictate how our lifestyle will be changed. Take for example the radio. It was touted the best thing that happened and the miracle of so many people contained in a little black box telling you stories. And when TV came around, it killed the radio. And they even wrote a song about how TV killed the radio man.

On the social front, we can also associate the air time of TV Shows to the population growth as well. Ever wonder why in some third world country where TV's were deemed a luxury or they are deemed items that "corrupt" your mind and you do not get to watch what you choose but some state approved programmes which basically entail a boring bloke reading out of a prompt card of which he will forget what he just read right after the "Good Night Comrades!!!"

Then came the computers where we actually IM our colleagues whom is sitting just behind us about the latest gossip or where is lunch today. Needless to say that those whom has found a job developing video games, were basically fuelled by the many online vampires whom are not out for blood to feed but constantly stays up late hypnotised by a video consol or a computer game.

On the social front again, you see more kids in a cyber café than you can find in the football pitch now a days. On a rainy day, you will never be able to find the wild kids whom will take to the fields sliding on the fields fantasising the way their idol does a fantastic tackle or the bicycle-kicks made famous by Pele. Instead, you will find them having more developed muscles on the thumbs and fingers executing deft precise clicks and swipes on a game consol to emulate that slide minus the rain, mud and body contact and offcourse the vulgarity which comes after the tackle, has never lost its shine and I have to say that the innovative mind has come up with some rather interesting and unique twist to the "old fashion" bloody cuss.

Then comes a new toy in the market recently and it is barely larger than a B5 dairy weighing in the region of about 6lbs. The iPad. A fantastic gizmo which I felt it was like Steve Jobs saw the iPhone market responding to it like moths to a flame! Seeing the success and asking how do we double the fun and quadruple the profits? Well, maybe a blurry staff whom is sleep deprived and mentally drained just blurted out, "If u think its just that @#$%@ easy, why dun u double our F&%#$@@ work and Quadruple the size of the B##@!&#% iPhone… mumble mumble…" And, Mr Job did his job yet again by taking the suggestion of a fellow employee, double the work load and made the iPhone bigger.

It had some very cautious reception but the ad campaigns were very well thought out and before they hit the market, people were already pre booking them. Opportunist whom has seen this potential, also jumped into the band wagon and the competitors introduced the Android powered tablets. I am not going to comment too much on the functionality and I still do believe that it is generically dependent on the user preference and there is no clear winner in any case. Its just like a Beemer fan will say how it drives well and handles great on the road and another whom may be an Audi driver will claim the A6 does it better…. The debate never stops but there are other factors where users will naturally be drawn to the sleek groovy looks while the accessories determines how big a freak you really is. A car is after all just a car… (I know many will disagree with me but I am using this as an anology, maybe not such a good one but I think you get my drift… because regardless what analogy I use, there will still be two big faction divided by preference, and that is my point).

So, having some history to refer to and faced with this new toy, how will our future turn out? Will be all be talking like NCIS agents in future and tapping on to a digital pad to cal up information where ever there is a 3G connection (which is basically a very large area). Will doctors now be faced with new medical terms to deal with like instead of a tennis elbow, we now call it an iPad elbow? Or what will we call the skin disorder of not having enough Vitamin D (due to the lack of sunlight)?

We have seen more cases of CTS and other Repetitive Strain Injuries more than actual sporting injuries. I suppose the Insurance Agencies will come up with some form of caveats where payout will be determined by the proper Ergonomic and Work Space Management plans in place and properly implemented as well.

I take the stand of embracing technology with a more liberal and adaptive approach. While we take in the technology, let's also not forget the humanity of social engagement and also nurture the emotions we humans are designed and created naturally to have and we need to develop this. Otherwise we will end up being "surrogates" to technology and the line of who is master will be blurred.

I like some of the games on the iPad developed where it can support more than one person to play on it at one time and this actually helps to foster interaction and sharing. This is the kind of development we should see more of and encourage the development of young minds to see the future as we like it to be and be the wise man our children will be telling their children in future. We keep saying our children will be the future, what then are we doing to ensure they are properly guided to do this and what are we doing to help them achieve to their best potential? It is time we step out of our shadow and start to work on our humanity first before we pass on our flaws to our children.